|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Gigantic Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mexico
Posts: 298
|
I would say that frames lend themselves perfectly to both professional looks and easy navigation.
The problem seems to be with the way search engines handle the pages, not with design deficiencies.
__________________
MEXICAN SLANG 101 |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Gigantic Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mexico
Posts: 298
|
LOL
Funny, because that's what I was saying on the design/development thread. Hard to weed them apart. But responding specifically to the questions of navigation and looks...it's hard to fault frames. Their drawbacks apparently lie in other areas.
__________________
MEXICAN SLANG 101 |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Gigantic Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mexico
Posts: 298
|
?????????????????????????????????
__________________
MEXICAN SLANG 101 |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,273
|
Sorry, but that's bollocks. You can have whatever programs you like, they won't do you the slightest good unless you know what you're doing with them. There's thousands of people out there who can and do create crap with either or both programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Gigantic Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mexico
Posts: 298
|
Neither of those sites did much for me. They look busy, with all these little boxes jumbled around. The blue flood of the first one could look good to some, awful to others.
__________________
MEXICAN SLANG 101 |
|
|
|