|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I found this information on http://www.socengine.com However I believe this is a threat and not practised to a high extent by Google, other wise it would come into conflict with there, "there's just about nothing anyone can do to harm your rankings" quote. I'm sure it would take a lot and many other factors for Google to do something about it. Or do they? Last edited by Postmaster; 03-05-2005 at 11:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Business Guru
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Near Inverness, Highlands, Scotland
Posts: 7,716
|
They are all possibilities, but they are all pretty much potential options described in the patent, rather than actual practice IMO.
Certainly younger sites that accrue links too fast will sandbox themselves in what I see as an entirely automated process. I believe that GoogleGuy (Matt Cutts) has already stated elsewhere that where sites perform particularly above the Google radar, they may come under manual review and WHOIS data referenced - domains that are bought by new owners as effectively being sent back to square one, and any established presence as devalued. Too much similar anchor text has certainly come up before now, and it is certainly wise to consider varying it - but as for link relevance - it's not a particular player as yet. The big key at the moment is that established domains have far more space to play with.
__________________
SEO specialist |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
At least we're lucky to have started our sites early in the game, because search engines are getting harder and harder to influence, I'd hate to open a site in 5 years time by that time we would have enough self made links not to worry about it.
|
|
|
|